I think it’s a little unfair that the Tea Party gets to categorize themselves as a third party when all of their candidates are running as members of the Republican Party. If they want to call themselves a party, the need to see if they can stand on their own and win on their own. I don’t think they can, and I think they know it. I wonder why the media has not called attantion to their differences from the GOP while mentioning that they are still running AS the GOP.
Archive for the 'civil liberties' Category
How do we convince people who do not derive power from it or lose out as a result of it that the White Male Privilege does exist and that it would be almost universally beneficial to eliminate it?
The Parent’s Television Council has decided to “scold” various TV shows for their representation of teenage sexuality. Most of the shows they chastised were geared towards adults, shows that young teens shouldn’t be watching anyway. Of course, whether or not a child should be watching a particular show should depend on the maturity of the child and the decision of their parents, not a Parent’s council.
Indirect censorship groups are gaining way too much power. Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club are censoring the release of Jon Stewart’s new book, Earth, for unknown reasons. Blockbuster and other video stores decide what they want to release to the public, and it’s usually based on the owner’s morals rather than actual inappropriate content. The rating system for movies in the US has absolutely no rhyme, reason, or rubric.
American’s are allowing their information, their books, their TV shows, and their movies to be censored with no knowledge of why or how. They put bling faith and trust in an agency without knowing the true purpose of the censorship. I’m so tired of being told what to watch, what to read, what to think… Even though I choose not to listen to these agencies, I find it more and more difficult to gain access to the information they don’t want me to have, even if it’s just a little sex on Glee.
I tried to have a discussion with a few friends of mine about the Wikileaks scandal and Assange’s arrest. My argument was against censorship and the slow errosion of our freedoms for the past 9 years. A Republican friend’s argument was that she would rather have to jump through hoops at every turn if it prevented a terrorist attack. I countered with the Benjamin Franklin quote, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety,” and said that I would almost rather there be another terrorist attack then slowly lose my rights one by one. That’s where she invoked the third rail of debate: 9/11.
The conversation immediately descended into the depths of hell, with several other Republicans coming to her aid. A few of my more liberal friends came to mine, and it turned out that NO ONE was really discussion the issue at hand: Is what Assange did really illegal? If documents written by the government of and by the people are taken by one of those people, is it really stealing? How do documents become “CLASSIFIED”? Who decides on the Constitutionality of that classification?
The important thing is this: If every time we attempt to have an adult conversation someone decides to end the discussion by screaming, “REMEMBER 9/11,” nothing will ever be discussed, let alone agreed upon. The constant steering of political discussions to the irrelevant (especially since the wars fought and most of the security decisions made since have NOTHING to do with the terrorist attacks) makes us all sound like children and does not further discourse in any way. A nation divided we definitely are, and I fear, a nation divided we shall remain.
“A nation is is formed by the willingness of each of us to share in the responsibility for upholding the common good. Let each person do his or her part. If one citizen is unwilling to participate, all of us are going to suffer. For the American idea, though it is shared by all of us, is realized by each one of us.” Barbara Jordan
President Obama seems determined to renew the American spirit and remind us that we are one nation, regardless of politics, religion, race, gender, or sexuality. We are only as strong as we are unified. Divided, we are nothing. Whether you voted for him or now, it is time to remember where you come from.
I’ve been waiting years for this night and I’m absolutely terrified. I really, really want to believe that Obama’s going to win, but I’m afraid that he won’t and I’ll be crushed. A world in which McCain is President is scary for me. I believe that he and his party want to control as much of my life as they possibly can including who I can marry and what I can do with my reproductive organs. I believe that if he wins, people will die from a lack of healh care and young women who have been raped will be forced to endure back rooom procedures or deal with the possible cconsequences of being a victim. I believe that funding for alternative education will be cut, putting me out of a job and stem cell research will be stunted, putting me out of a sister.
I don’t believe things will be perfect under Obama. I don’t even necessarily believe they’ll be all that better than they are now. But they will be better. If we’re lucky, we’ll get to keep the civil rights we have and gain a few more. I don’t expect to see a revolution. I just don’t want to feel like we’re in a hole that we’ll never climb out of. I need hope, and McCain can’t give it to me.
Partisanship has been a huge topic of discussion for the past few years, mosly because when Party A wants to get something done and Party B disagrees, Party A claims that they only disagree because of partisanship. They don’t stop to consider that what they want to do is financially irresponsible or morally wrong. The just think the other party is being obstinate, which is pretty insulting, but I digress. At some point during all of this Us vs. Them fighting, some of us started to realize that there ARE issues in which the parties are diametrically opposed, and agreeing to disagree just doesn’t fly when legislation is involved.
But we all have friends. And having made many of our friends before we were so partisan or found ourselves surrounded by politics, we sometimes find that our friends are of the opposite party. Family is one thing. You HAVE to love them, unless being around them is physically or emotionally damaging. But friends are a gray area. You want to believe that they are good people, despite their political beliefs, but then you have to ask yourself: Can you be a good person if you think it’s okay to deny someone a basic civil right? Can you be a good person if you don’t believe that everyone should have equal access to health care? Can you be a good person if you really believe that we’re doing the right thing in Iraq? Can you be a good person if you drive an SUV or a Hummer for fun? Can you be a good person if you continually ignore the fact that schools filled with minority students are vastly underfunded? Can you be a good person if you think automatic weapons are fine in the hands of criminals?
So the problem is this: They think they can be good people and believe all of those things, and I just don’t. If it divides our country, so be it. If it pits brother against brother and tears families apart, so be it. But no one, especially not in this country, should be forced to compromise on something they believe in with all of their heart simply to keep the peace. And they shouldn’t have to pretend that it’s something it’s not. It is NOT partisanship. It is the difference between RIGHT and WRONG. The Republicans are just WRONG.