14
Apr
08

Fines or Fuel?

While everyone’s focusing on the current situation with the airlines, few people are asking why it’s so important for them to make the safety changes now, especially when it’s already been proved that we’ve been flying in unsafe planes for years.  Maybe it has more to do with the rising cost of fuel and the fact that airlines are breaking even or losing money on fuel every time they put a plane in the air.  Of course, no one wants to fault the oil companies for anything, and we pretend they’re above reproach, so the major airlines can’t come out and say, “We can’t afford to fly because fuel prices are so high.”  That would allow for a lot of criticism that the government can’t answer.

Without a massive protest, without airlines shutting down and giving us the real reason, without truckers staying off the road for more than a few hours, without people refusing to drive to work because they can’t afford gas, there will never be a change.  DRIVE LESS, FLY LESS, BUY LOCAL GOODS!!!

Here’s a really good reason to conserve fuel: 4,032 US Soldiers killed in Iraq; 29,676 US soldiers wounded in Iraq.


8 Responses to “Fines or Fuel?”


  1. 1 Saur April 15, 2008 at 1:13 pm

    AMEN! You preach it, sister. You know, I do wonder about something I heard recently. I heard someone say that if the Prez decided to go to the oil companies and said “We WILL NOT pay more than $xxx”, they would have to concur. Of course they might TRY to continue selling oil and gasoline to us, but eventually - since we’re their major customer - if we held out, they’d be forced to give in. I wonder if that’s true?

  2. 2 unitedwelay1 April 16, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    I’m sure it is, but I’ll do some research and get back to you. Life is nuts at the moment.

  3. 3 daveawayfromhome April 17, 2008 at 12:04 am

    You know, maybe I’m being naive, but wouldnt the solution to high fuel prices be… raise ticket prices? I mean, so what if you lose customers? That cant last too long because eventually those undercutting you by losing money will be forced to go out of business. Or is the competition to see who can lose the most money?

  4. 4 The Zombieslayer April 20, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    Scientific American published an article on how $420 billion spent on solar panel over the next 40 years would rid ourselves of our overseas gas problem once and for all. Great article. It was in the January issue. It’s my next post, but I’m still writing it up so it may not be there for a few days.

  5. 5 unitedwelay1 April 21, 2008 at 11:24 am

    They can’t raise ticket prices because most of their business comes from commuter fliughts that people won’t be able to afford if rates go up.

  6. 6 daveawayfromhome April 21, 2008 at 9:37 pm

    That’s illogical. You cannot raise tickets because you’ll go out of business from lack of passengers. So instead you go out of business because you lost money on each of those passengers due to underpricing. Either way you loose, and the commuters continue to live what is, really, an unsustainable lifestyle. The affordability of fuel is partially what’s gotten us into this mess in the first place (that and unabashed gluttony).

  7. 7 Deb April 27, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    I want safety. So I don’t mind the delays.

    And we really do need to look at alternative energies.

  8. 8 Homeland Conspiracy May 2, 2008 at 7:54 pm

    Corn for fuel & not for food says it all. “We” seem to want to feed an SUV but not a human

Leave a Reply




Disclaimer

I am not perfect. I do my best to practice what I preach, but I am human. My mantra is, "DO NO HARM". I may not always succeed, but I will always try. My goal is to be a better person today than I was yesterday.

Fair Use Notice

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Incidentally, this notice itself was swiped from Spiiderweb and Dave Away From Home